https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 --- Comment #12 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Cristian Le from comment #10) > Both `yq` should be compatible with each other and compatible with `jq`. No > reason why we can't have both implementations as long as both are prefixed > with `python/go`. Not sure if each one needs to mark the other as > conflicting explicitly or if that is handled by `Provides` automatically. Hmm, as matter of fact, current spec provides %{_bindir}/yq, just as bug #2074467 package. So they will conflict once passed both. In order to both be installable on single system, at least one of them need to rename the conflicting binary. A way around that would be using alternatives subsystem, where both could provide the same name and user would choose a preferred one. But that would require interchangable parameters, at least to some extent. I don't remember my exact workflow when creating the package. I think I haven't used any tool to create spec file, but used existing package as a template with manual changes. I have found OpenSUSE rpm spec at https://build.opensuse.org/projects/devel:languages:python/packages/python-yq/files/python-yq.spec?expand=1 I am not confident lowering of explicit requirements would be safe without using it that first. I think such lowering should happen only for older releases, if any. Yes, I would like to finish this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263790%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
