https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278420 --- Comment #12 from wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> --- I just wanted to approve the package because to me it looks great, but found one check (the other one is solved after reading https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_requires) that prevented me from doing so. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT License". 1877 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python- jupytext/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Note: License file installed only when python-jupytext-doc is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/man, /usr, /usr/lib/python3.12, /usr/share/man/man1, /usr/share, /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages, /usr/share/jupyter, /usr/lib, /usr/share/jupyter/labextensions, /usr/share/doc, /etc/jupyter/jupyter_notebook_config.d, /etc/jupyter/jupyter_server_config.d, /usr/bin, /etc, /etc/jupyter [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/man, /usr/lib/python3.12/site- packages, /usr, /usr/lib/python3.12, /etc/jupyter/jupyter_notebook_config.d, /usr/share, /etc/jupyter/jupyter_server_config.d, /usr/share/man/man1, /usr/share/jupyter, /usr/lib, /usr/share/jupyter/labextensions, /etc, /etc/jupyter, /usr/bin [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 7961 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?) [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-jupytext , python3-jupyterlab-jupytext [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-jupytext-1.16.2-1.fc41.noarch.rpm python3-jupyterlab-jupytext-1.16.2-1.fc41.noarch.rpm python-jupytext-doc-1.16.2-1.fc41.noarch.rpm python-jupytext-1.16.2-1.fc41.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpgsd_s48n')] checks: 32, packages: 4 python3-jupytext.noarch: W: python-leftover-require python-jupyter-filesystem python3-jupytext.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupytext-config python3-jupyterlab-jupytext.noarch: W: no-documentation python-jupytext.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: jupytext-1.16.2-vendor.tar.xz python3-jupytext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/jupytext-config 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings, 21 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 1.4 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "python3-jupytext". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "python3-jupyterlab-jupytext". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "python-jupytext-doc". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/mwouts/jupytext/archive/v1.16.2/jupytext-1.16.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 68a09dc8393bd5ceff995cf60377d53e003f0035ddf2f6bc2e23fa46e3575380 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 68a09dc8393bd5ceff995cf60377d53e003f0035ddf2f6bc2e23fa46e3575380 Requires -------- python3-jupytext (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 config(python3-jupytext) python(abi) python-jupyter-filesystem python3.12dist(markdown-it-py) python3.12dist(mdit-py-plugins) python3.12dist(nbformat) python3.12dist(packaging) python3.12dist(pyyaml) python3-jupyterlab-jupytext (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): jupyterlab python(abi) python3-jupytext python-jupytext-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-jupytext: config(python3-jupytext) python-jupytext python3-jupytext python3.12-jupytext python3.12dist(jupytext) python3dist(jupytext) python3-jupyterlab-jupytext: bundled(npm(base64-js)) bundled(npm(buffer)) bundled(npm(ieee754)) bundled(npm(jupyterlab-rise)) python-jupyterlab-jupytext python3-jupyterlab-jupytext python3.12-jupyterlab-jupytext python-jupytext-doc: python-jupytext-doc Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name python-jupytext --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, Haskell, Java, PHP, R, Ocaml, C/C++, fonts, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278420 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278420%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
