[Bug 1080583] Review Request: compat-qpid-cpp - Compatibility modules for Qpid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583



--- Comment #16 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Darryl, 

You might have missed the RbConfig part in the spec file. 

Also, could you also take a look at these as well please?

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/libexec/qpid,
     /usr/lib64/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client, /etc/rc.d, /etc/rc.d/init.d,
     /usr/lib64/qpid/daemon

compat-qpid-cpp-client.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion qpid-cpp-client-ssl <= 0.24
obsoletes qpid-cpp-client-ssl = 0.24

compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used
/etc/rc.d/init.d/qpidd-primary

compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name qpidd-primary
('compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha', 'compat-qpid-cpp-server-had')

As far as I can tell, we are close to getting this done ... Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]