https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583 --- Comment #15 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #13) > To go through the remaining issues, > > > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Fixed > - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. > Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in compat-qpid-cpp-server > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries > > Related rpmlint error - > > compat-qpid-cpp-server.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig > /usr/lib64/libqpidbroker.so.2.0.0 Fixed. > [?]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > Note: %define requiring justification: %{!?python_sitearch: %define > python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import > get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > > Why %define here? That was missed when others were replaced. I've fixed it now. > > compat-qpid-cpp.src: E: specfile-error -e:1:in `<main>': Use RbConfig > instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > compat-qpid-cpp.src: E: specfile-error -e:1:in `<main>': Use RbConfig > instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > compat-qpid-cpp.src: E: specfile-error -e:1:in `<main>': Use RbConfig > instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. > compat-qpid-cpp.src: E: specfile-error -e:1:in `<main>': Use RbConfig > instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. Fixed. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6843052 Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-6.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review