https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583 --- Comment #17 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #16) > Hi Darryl, > > You might have missed the RbConfig part in the spec file. > > Also, could you also take a look at these as well please? > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/libexec/qpid, > /usr/lib64/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client, /etc/rc.d, /etc/rc.d/init.d, > /usr/lib64/qpid/daemon > > compat-qpid-cpp-client.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion qpid-cpp-client-ssl <= > 0.24 obsoletes qpid-cpp-client-ssl = 0.24 > > compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used > /etc/rc.d/init.d/qpidd-primary > > compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name > qpidd-primary ('compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha', 'compat-qpid-cpp-server-had') This is a non-issue: -ha is an acronym for "high availability". > > As far as I can tell, we are close to getting this done ... Thanks! No, my bad -- if you look the specfile there wasn't the updated one with release 6. I forgot to upload the update. It addresses the issues. That said, I've bumped the release to fix the above to directory problems. I can't have compat-qpid-cpp own directories like /etc/rc.d/init.d or /etc/rc.d so I'm not going to make this own them. The obsoletions were fixed in 6 as well. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6846099 Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-7.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review