Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glade - User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806093 Summary: Review Request: glade - User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/glade.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/glade-3.11.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Glade is a RAD tool to enable quick and easy development of user interfaces for the GTK+ toolkit and the GNOME desktop environment. The user interfaces designed in Glade are saved as XML, which can be used in numerous programming languages including C, C++, C#, Vala, Java, Perl, Python, and others. ----------------------------------------- This is the GTK+ 3 version of Glade. During the gtk3 development cycle, upstream renamed 'glade3' to 'glade', to make the gtk2 and gtk3 versions parallel installable. 'glade3' is the gtk2 version and 'glade' is the gtk3 version. Confusingly enough, in Fedora we have the gtk3 version in 'glade3' package and don't have the gtk2 version packaged up at all. This package is the first step in getting back in line with upstream naming. Upstream blog post about the rename: http://blogs.gnome.org/tvb/2011/01/15/the-glade-dl/ Various tickets opened in Fedora bugzilla about providing both glade and glade3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708834 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717763 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731227 P.S. I'm not yet sure how it's best to name the gtk2 compat package: should it be 'glade3' like upstream is calling it, or should it be 'glade-gtk2' for clarity? The latter would likely also involve renaming /us r/bin/glade-3 to /usr/bin/glade-gtk2 as a downstream distro modification, so I'm not sure we'd want to take that route. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review