Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cement - CLI Application Framework for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 Summary: Review Request: cement - CLI Application Framework for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: wdierkes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/cement.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/cement-0.8.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Cement is an advanced CLI Application Framework for Python. It promotes code re-use by way of plugins and helper libraries that can be shared between any application built on Cement. The MVC and overall framework design is very much inspired by the TurboGears2 web framework. Its goal is to introduce a standard, and feature-full platform for both simple and complex command line applications as well as support rapid development needs without sacrificing quality. At a minimum, Cement configures the following features for every application: * Multiple Configuration file parsing (default: /etc, ~/) * Command line argument and option parsing * Dual Console/File Logging Support * Full Internal and External (3rd Party) Plugin support * Basic "hook" support * Full MVC support for advanced application design * Text output rendering with Genshi templates * Json output rendering allows other programs to access your CLI-API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review