Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-31 09:39 EST ------- A. Oh, please don't change the original source tarball without changing its version!! This will confuse people who use evolution-brutus. md5sum: a4ad27d8c158dcea301c23e7e75ebdf0 evolution-brutus-1.1.7-2/evolution-brutus-1.1.7.tar.gz aa9d8ae81ae87851b74de0d92fa09ab7 evolution-brutus-1.1.7-3/evolution-brutus-1.1.7.tar.gz You should either * make patches against original 1.1.7.tar.gz tarball or * release new version of evolution-brutus B. I have not yet rebuilt the new srpm you uploaded, however: I use rawhide, and Fedora Extras packages have to be rebuilt firstly for rawhide environment as buildsys forces it. I have to say that current evolution and evolution-data-server in rawhide is: [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ rpm -q evolution evolution-data-server evolution-2.9.1-2.fc7 evolution-data-server-1.9.1-2.fc7 Please adjust your spec file for these versions. Through a glance look at your spec, %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus This is no longer correct as current (current means rawhide) evolution-data-server has: /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.10/ . Please use %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-*/brutus to avoid version changing (also please check if there is some API change or so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review