[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus
Alias: evolution-brutus

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520





------- Additional Comments From colding@xxxxxxxxx  2006-11-01 02:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #44)
> A.
> Oh, please don't change the original source tarball without changing
> its version!! This will confuse people who use evolution-brutus.

OK, I'll just release new versions instead.


> B. 
> I have not yet rebuilt the new srpm you uploaded, however:
> I use rawhide, and Fedora Extras packages have to be rebuilt firstly
> for rawhide environment as buildsys forces it.
> 
> I have to say that current evolution and evolution-data-server in rawhide is:
> [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ rpm -q evolution evolution-data-server
> evolution-2.9.1-2.fc7
> evolution-data-server-1.9.1-2.fc7
> 
> Please adjust your spec file for these versions.
> Through a glance look at your spec,
> 
> %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus
> 
> This is no longer correct as current (current means rawhide)
> evolution-data-server has: /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.10/ .
> Please use  %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-*/brutus to
> avoid version changing (also please check if there is some API change or
> so).

Just one question: All of these version dependancies are detected during a run
of autogen.sh and are then used when the spec is created from the spec.in.
Should I remove all of this "clever" version detection stuff and just use '*'
whereever a version dependent directory shows up?

The same goes for my locale file. It has generally been like this:

evolution-brutus-VERSION.mo

I did this after looking in several spec files, such as the evolution-connector
spec. This spec has currently(*):

%files -f evolution-exchange-%{evo_major}.lang

where evo_major is defined in the top of the spec. There is a lot of hardcoded
(via %define) paths in that spec. This must surely be wrong, yes?

BTW, the evolution-connector spec does not use find-lang. Is that wrong?

Thanks,
  jules

(*)
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-connector/evolution-connector.spec?view=markup

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]