[Bug 530205] New: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for videogame property editing UIs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530205

           Summary: Review Request: AntTweakBar - GUI library for
                    videogame property editing UIs
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: sean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/AntTweakBar/AntTweakBar.spec
SRPM URL:
http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/AntTweakBar/AntTweakBar-1.13-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
Library for easily creating and using tweakable properties in an OpenGL
or SDL application, designed primarily for professional game developers.


There are a few ugly hacks I put in the spec file to get things to build and to
get rid of rpmlint warnings.  Upstream is Windows-centric and has a pretty
crappy build setup for Linux.

I also had to apply two patches, and these are the first time I've applied
patches with any of my packages, so hopefully I did that part right.

The only thing I'm particularly unsure about with this package is whether or
not I should put the examples/demos into a sub-package.  I'm not sure they're
really useful to people without the source.  I've seen a few packages that
include the example source in the docs directory, but I'm not a huge fan of
that approach myself.  I decided to just leave them out entirely for now.

rpmlint of spec file:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint of source RPM:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint of binary RPMs:
AntTweakBar-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

(I was told during the libtelnet review that that warning was bogus and to
ignore it, since there's no particular extra documentation to add to the -devel
package.)

The Koji scratch build for F12:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1761658

And Koji scratch build for F11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1761680

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]