Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-12 11:51 EST ------- -------------------------------------------------- I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. -------------------------------------------------- * Well, another unowned directory is found: /usr/include/brutusd-1.0/ * Well, "2.8" tag is actually related with evolution version. configure says: GETTEXT_PACKAGE=evolution-brutus-${EVOLUTION_VERSION} and po/Makefile.in.in says: echo "installing $$lang.gmo as $$dir/$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).mo" So, the line %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 should be changed according to the version of evolution. If this src.rpm is supposed to be used both on FC6-devel and FC5, then the suffix of "2.8" must be automatically changed. One way to do this is: -------------------------------------------------------- for f in %{_bindir}/evolution-* ; do evover=${f#%{_bindir}/evolution-} done %{find_lang} %{name}-${evover} --------------------------------------------------------- With applying this, the version-specific conflict for evolution can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review