Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-13 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > -------------------------------------------------- > I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of > sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. > -------------------------------------------------- > > * Well, another unowned directory is found: > /usr/include/brutusd-1.0/ OK, fixed. > * Well, "2.8" tag is actually related with evolution version. > configure says: > > GETTEXT_PACKAGE=evolution-brutus-${EVOLUTION_VERSION} > > and po/Makefile.in.in says: > > echo "installing $$lang.gmo as $$dir/$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).mo" > > So, the line %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 should be changed according > to the version of evolution. If this src.rpm is supposed to be > used both on FC6-devel and FC5, then the suffix of "2.8" must be > automatically changed. One way to do this is: > > -------------------------------------------------------- > for f in %{_bindir}/evolution-* ; do > evover=${f#%{_bindir}/evolution-} > done > > %{find_lang} %{name}-${evover} > --------------------------------------------------------- > With applying this, the version-specific conflict for evolution can be > removed. Well, I really did not intent this SRPM to be used on anything but FC6(-devel), as FC4/5 SRPMs are automatically generated by my build script, but your solution is so elegant and clever that I simply *must* use it. Thanks a lot! New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-10.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review