Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-8.at.src.rpm Description: VTK is an open-source software system for image processing, 3D graphics, volume rendering and visualization. VTK includes many advanced algorithms (e.g., surface reconstruction, implicit modelling, decimation) and rendering techniques (e.g., hardware-accelerated volume rendering, LOD control). Expected rpmlint output: o E: vtk-* script-without-shellbang *.cmake I'm not sure why rpmlint detects cmake files as scripts. o E: * zero-length */hints That's inherited from the upstream sources. Maybe having an empty hints file is needed, but I will ask upstream. Keeping it for now. o E: vtk-testing.* script-without-shellbang .*tcl Is it worth fixing this? o W: vtk-devel unstripped-binary-or-object <wrapper dirs>/*.so debuginfo processing missed this as these are place in non-standard folders. Manually strip and have only half a debuginfo worth of symbols, hack into debuginfo generation, or maybe simply allow these devel files to carry the symbols? o wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding on an windows file in the examples doc. The examples contain a couple of non-Linux parts, but I don't want to castrate them. Maybe someone will develop on several archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review