Am Donnerstag, 15. April 2010 13:41:38 schrieb Nelson Marques: > It is strange someone pulls the issue "market penetration" when before > on this very same list the topic was aborded in a very different way. I > don't believe there is coherence here. So we are expanding or not > expanding? Nelson, my point was *not* about our market penetration or our expansion philosophy - it is about the market penetration that the vendor tries to get from shipping it in fedora - this is a benefit for the vendor besides all the other i already explained in my previous email. > So our target is developers or mainstream users ? I'm getting > really loose of the real targets of Fedora once more... no further comment here ;) just refer to this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-October/msg00350.html > Nice. But as Jan mentioned before, the issue is around: Should we > promote it or not? I made valid points why it is a success story also in my previous email. > We are full of load, it's a waste of manpower to > support stuff that comes in a pesky way. This wording is a bit unlucky for all the people who put a lot effort into this - and not a valid point! > > We should not discourage the idea to have a good symbioses with other > > vendors. The Framework is working and can be used with all Features that > > a Fedora User is able to use. > It seems to me that this is a very grey area. it is pretty clear it is legal in Fedora - it works without the need of additional components - it is Open Source - you can do a fork! Please Marketing People do not make the same mistake as with Fedora Electronic Lab features - last release! cu Joerg -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
