On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:58 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > And if you submit this version for board approval as an "official" Fedora > release, I'm pretty sure you'd get it. Who should actually approve different spins as being "Formally Fedora"? /me likes the audio pun in that title, and it is more accurate than the abused word 'official' I'll be honest -- I don't mind that there be a Board rubber stamp [Formally Fedora Spin], but it needs to be just that -- a rubber stamp approval on top of a recommendation from a group of people who can actually vet the individual distro. Perhaps I see a flood of such requests. Perhaps I personally fear the work of figuring out how to automate the testing of such requests. Based on the new understanding of the Board's role, shouldn't it be the Board says, "Fedora needs to formally recognize new community-sourced spins that are within Fedora guidelines," and FESCo makes it so? Presumably by firing up a SIG, modifying some build sys magic, and so forth. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
