Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:58 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > >> And if you submit this version for board approval as an "official" Fedora >> release, I'm pretty sure you'd get it. > > Who should actually approve different spins as being "Formally Fedora"? > > /me likes the audio pun in that title, and it is more accurate than the > abused word 'official' > > I'll be honest -- I don't mind that there be a Board rubber stamp > [Formally Fedora Spin], but it needs to be just that -- a rubber stamp > approval on top of a recommendation from a group of people who can > actually vet the individual distro. > > Perhaps I see a flood of such requests. Perhaps I personally fear the > work of figuring out how to automate the testing of such requests. > > Based on the new understanding of the Board's role, shouldn't it be the > Board says, "Fedora needs to formally recognize new community-sourced > spins that are within Fedora guidelines," and FESCo makes it so? > Presumably by firing up a SIG, modifying some build sys magic, and so > forth. > > - Karsten > This is not a bad idea at all. I'd gladly volunteer for such a SIG. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
