On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 13:58 -0300, Rodrigo Padula wrote: > Ok!!!! > > Reading the answers i see how the VOICE of the community is heard and > is "very important" in the project! Obviously the voice of the community is very important to Fedora. Do you agree? Or is the above a bit of sarcasm? If so, I'm sure we'd all like to hear how you feel the voice of the community is treated in Fedora. In this case, members of the same community as you have spoken up and explained the reasons why things are as they are. Thanks, folks. I trust these community voices more than I do Wikipedia. > The FSF disagree of you! I think it was pointed out a few times in this thread that it is not entirely clear what the FSF agrees to. We are all constantly in murky waters, trying to see together the right direction to swim. This includes the FSF. They are not dieties, not even Enlightened. They just have a nice, bright, clear light that helps us see the way. But it is not the only light, nor always the best one to pay attention to when swimming. - Karsten, hoping his swimming metaphor didn't lose any non-native speakers > -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
