-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >>> Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: >>> >>>>>> Developers have been communicating that this release >>>>>> cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while now. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, and it seems that was not enough. >>>> >>>> Depends on where you get the information from. For example, >>>> distrowatch corrected its previous misconception recently. >>>> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1 >>> >>> That's not "official" - >>> >> What do you consider official?. > > > Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed > mail to one of the mailinglists from a official person. A > press-release. > > But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or > wikipedia-writers. > >> How do we communicate all the official information out there to >> make sure there isnt too many assumptions? > > > At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the > community if they are floating around like this one. > > How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the > best place because I suspect some people don't trust the > informations there. I agree... That's (amongst others) the purpose of the fedora-announce mailing list, is it not? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD3nE0XM+XOp70dwoRAk5wAJ9PSu6LKEU7RvHFUo4xCW+bWECx1ACfcci5 csgJfk30mpjFjeDsZS7wQYw= =5Gvn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
