Re: development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5Test2(LWN): Some comments)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> Fedora is not solely focussed on the desktop. Tying it up on the
> GNOME release schedule only makes sense if you are a solely
> concentrating on the desktop. Fedora Core is more of a general
> purpose operating system now. Any proposed change for that needs
> the buy-in from many of the core developers. That really isnt a
> discussion for marketing.

It should then be possible to update GNOME if a new release comes
during Fedora's lifespan (and while the previous release is not moved
to Legacy yet), just as KDE has been updated from 3.4 to 3.5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD3m/XXM+XOp70dwoRAiSlAJ4irHO+ad7R3fDMNbKnE7ecl7LaogCeKlQg
6Y1oqBJG8e/utDccFkhoyFk=
=hOtL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux