Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >>>>Developers have been > >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while > >>>>now. > >>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough. > >>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch > >>corrected its previous misconception recently. > >>http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1 > >That's not "official" - > > > What do you consider official?. Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release. But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or wikipedia-writers. > How do we communicate all the official > information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions? At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the community if they are floating around like this one. How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the best place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there. -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
