Re: development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:58 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >> How do we communicate all the official 
> >>information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
> >At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
> >community if they are floating around like this one.
> >How? Red Hat magazine? 
> I dont think writing a article exclusively about release changes in Red 
> Hat Magazine is worthy.

Sure, but we have a Fedora Status page there -- one sentence there and
the whole situation is clarified.

> >fedora.redhat.com?
> >
> The schedule page already shows the current release schedule. The next 
> schedule is undecided at this point

And that's part of the problem IMHO.

CU
thl
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux