On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:38 PM Dennis Payne <dulsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @Aleksandra: I'm not blaming Gwyn. I understand she is just trying to help me out. > > I can work around the problem like rebuilding from src. It isn't really a big problem for me. I'm just trying to explain how it will look to less technical users. I'll probably hold off on updating the kids' machines to Fedora 31 but that isn't a big deal. Sure, I agree with your point. > As for your solution how will that work when we upgrade to Fedora 32? Will all modules be disabled since we are getting rid of them? I need to verify the upgrade process which is being developed. My expectation is that default stream packages should cleanly update to the nonmodular package, but I need to check it. But I don't want to get rid of modules completely. We do have minetest version 4.16 in epel repositories. And since it is not compatible with 5.x client, it makes sense to keep minetest 4.x packaged for Fedora (if it can be built and doesn't require dependencies to be rebuilt into the module). I would try to use module for that, I just don't want to expose it as default, so that people would need to explicitly configure it to try it out. -- Aleksandra Fedorova bookwar _______________________________________________ Fedora Games SIG mailing list -- games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to games-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
