On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No match. Consider excluding the least flexible respondents by clickingOn Ter, 2016-08-30 at 07:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> For everyone's reference, here is the results link so far:
>
> http://whenisgood.net/fedora/games/2016/fallmeeting/ results/m2n4t
> d9
on the names towards the end of the list.
Sérgio M. B.
It looks as though it's just the six of us so far, and meeting slots can only accommodate 4 at the most?
I don't know about everyone else, but my schedule is liable to change in January (I'm a graduate student, so next semester things will likely be different), so we might be able to pick a better timeslot then.
In the interests of getting meetings to actually happen sooner rather than later, I wouldn't mind if a timeslot excluding me was picked; I can always read the logs afterwards. :)
Ben Rosser
_______________________________________________ Fedora Games SIG mailing list games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
