> On 08/20/2011 11:39 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote >> I thought you meant duplicating the data files only. > > I did clarify again what I meant in my previous mail. > >> You could put the >> autodlrc in a -common package for one of the engines that both require. >> Make it so chocolate would require vavoom-data-common or whatever, as >> would vavoom, but chocolate wouldn't require vavoom proper. > > doom.autodlrc is not specific to vavoom. So don't see why a common data > package would be called that. That's not a requirement, just a way to get away with not making a separate SRPM. That might be best, actually, maybe doom-shareware-data or somesuch? If you want to make it, I can review it. -J > Rahul > _______________________________________________ > games mailing list > games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games > -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie _______________________________________________ games mailing list games@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/games
