On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:24:13 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:57:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the > > > MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and > > > MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o) > > > > > > I don't really understand what is broken. > > > > Bugzilla has the info for almost a year now. Just query the pyxdg bug > > reports. That is the least thing you ought to do before touching somebody's > > package. > > Erm, why would anyone care about an FC3 bug? I thought all FC3 bugs > were closed anyway? What is so difficult to understand? At the time the bug report was filed, FC3+FE3 was still alive. Btw, treating bugzilla like a gateway to /dev/null is simply impolite. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
