On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:57:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the > MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and > MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o) > > I don't really understand what is broken. Bugzilla has the info for almost a year now. Just query the pyxdg bug reports. That is the least thing you ought to do before touching somebody's package. > The package built, I just > submitted it to the buildsys as someone suggested that I step up and > do. If you know so much about the situation, why don't you add some > useful comments? The package needs real maintenance, not just a slave who triggers a build. If you don't consider my comments useful, I can't help it. :( Bugzilla is your friend. I've added you to Cc list of a ticket, so you should have received a notification meanwhile. The situation is that we've tried to contact the maintainer in bugzilla for a very long time without success. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
