On 8/27/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:57:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the > MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and > MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o) > > I don't really understand what is broken. Bugzilla has the info for almost a year now. Just query the pyxdg bug reports. That is the least thing you ought to do before touching somebody's package.
Erm, why would anyone care about an FC3 bug? I thought all FC3 bugs were closed anyway? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
