Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-08-25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MS" == Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> writes:

MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the
MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and
MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o)

I don't really understand what is broken.  The package built, I just
submitted it to the buildsys as someone suggested that I step up and
do.  If you know so much about the situation, why don't you add some
useful comments?

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux