On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:17 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:06 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > > >>rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Corsepius) writes: > >> > >> > >>>>2. 'fedora-usermgmt' eases propagation of UIDs to NIS/LDAP servers. > >>> > >>>Well, it is just ONE way of doing it, but it is not "the only way to do > >>>it", nor is it "THE CORRECT way of doing it" > >> > >>Did I said something like this? > > > > No, but it's what fedora-usermgmt does. > > > > YOU are dictating uid ranges, YOU are fixing uids, you are forcing > > packagers to pollute their specs with YOUR proprietary stuff. > > AFAIK, fedora-usermgmt does nothing different than usual useradd > behavior until it is configured by local admins. Nobody (other than the > local admin) is dictating/forcing anything. Then think this to the end: The majority of all users will not use it. The others with have to struggle with it. ... except of cause that it pollutes the Fedora specs. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
