On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:06 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Corsepius) writes: > > >> 2. 'fedora-usermgmt' eases propagation of UIDs to NIS/LDAP servers. > > > > Well, it is just ONE way of doing it, but it is not "the only way to do > > it", nor is it "THE CORRECT way of doing it" > > Did I said something like this? No, but it's what fedora-usermgmt does. YOU are dictating uid ranges, YOU are fixing uids, you are forcing packagers to pollute their specs with YOUR proprietary stuff. > > It's not much more but the way YOU prefer, and as such it inevitably > > will conflicts with other approaches/strategies. > > As written in this thread, without explicit configuration > 'fedora-usermgmt' behaves exactly like a plain 'useradd' and will > conflict with other approaches/strategies exactly like a plain useradd > (which seems to be accepted by you). Then remove it from the specs, make it a runtime options and let it act completely transparent. As I see it, fedora-usermgmt is not transparent, the fact it appears inside of the specs proves it. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
