On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:34:35AM +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On 02/05/2016 11:34 PM, Dylan Combs wrote: > > (2) tooling that worked like a git/pull-request model? > > As a developer I am really opposed to inflicting git's pull/request > work flows on Humans. IMO docs and code have a highly divergent set > of attributes and what makes git good for code doesn't help at all > with docs, in fact the complexity of git work flow is just a barrier > to entry for a lot of potential docs contributors. Elsewhere I mentioned online editing in a git repo (which could be made transparent to a user). The user edits in a web browser, and doesn't worry about the pull-request mechanics. I'm not married to that by any means. But it seems to me that someone clicking a link, editing in a text entry form, and hitting a "Save" button without having to do any other work is a pretty low barrier and worth aiming for. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
