Should we have styling more like the getfedora.org site? Fedora Magazine? The Spins page? I think we can easily take some of their visual elements. The layout is quite nice though. Once we are ready to generate docs in whatever tool-chain we want, it will be awesome. Did you give any thought as to how to help users understand why we have three categories of documentation for each release? Should we now group by the fedora.next groupings? regards, bex On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:57 AM, Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Signed PGP part > On 02/21/2015 10:30 AM, Jeff Fearn wrote: > > Hi all, just to update on this topic. > > > > My demo site [1] is pretty stable now. It's completely built from Fedora Docs git repos and the publican devel branch with my updated build script [2]. > > > > The top of the script contains full instructions for creating a test site, it's almost all automated or cut-n-paste to the command line, so anyone should be able to get a test site up. > > > > Warning: It does take a long time to build the first time as it has to check out al the books :) > > > > Lee is currently doing some fixes for Red Hat docs, so we intend to release a new version of Publican in 2-3 weeks. That release will contain all the changes in the devel branch. > > > > Cheers, Jeff. > > > > 1: https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/fdocs/en-US/index.html > > 2: https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/rebuild_site.sh > > Shout out to Luke Brooker who gave me some CSS patches for the > breadcrumb menus on the test site. > > They where frustrating me no end, so thanks mate! > > https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/fdocs/en-US/index.html#Fedora > > Cheers, Jeff. > > -- > docs mailing list > docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
