Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 07:06 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: >> As per this consensus, we'll proceed until the previously decided >> nomination closing time (23:59 UTC today) to see if enough candidates >> appear to stand for FDSCo election. If not, we'll postpone FDSCo >> elections until the end of the month, freeing up the voting system for >> others to use. > > I'm a bit torn here, showing my indecisive side quite clearly: > > * We have not enough candidates for an election (3 nominations, 3 seats, > so voting isn't useful) > 6 ought to be enough for anybody! :-) Vladimir > * To fill up the nominations is feeling very rushed, with four hours > left to go > > * People on this project are not fully aware of the election > > * Serious people have put up their names for nomination, and they > deserve respect and a fair/useful election > > * Putting off until 24 Dec. or later for elections really means we want > to wait until the New Year, which is _very_far_off_ our schedule of > "just after the release." Oops. > > * FAMSCo seems ready to go and chomping at the bit > > * If we postpone we risk losing the momentum we have > > * Someone is potentially upset with the outcome no matter what the > decision > > Oops, sorry, the last point is just my "place of always being stuck" as > a leader. :) > > Tick tick tick ... > > - Karsten >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
