On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 07:06 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > As per this consensus, we'll proceed until the previously decided > nomination closing time (23:59 UTC today) to see if enough candidates > appear to stand for FDSCo election. If not, we'll postpone FDSCo > elections until the end of the month, freeing up the voting system for > others to use. I'm a bit torn here, showing my indecisive side quite clearly: * We have not enough candidates for an election (3 nominations, 3 seats, so voting isn't useful) * To fill up the nominations is feeling very rushed, with four hours left to go * People on this project are not fully aware of the election * Serious people have put up their names for nomination, and they deserve respect and a fair/useful election * Putting off until 24 Dec. or later for elections really means we want to wait until the New Year, which is _very_far_off_ our schedule of "just after the release." Oops. * FAMSCo seems ready to go and chomping at the bit * If we postpone we risk losing the momentum we have * Someone is potentially upset with the outcome no matter what the decision Oops, sorry, the last point is just my "place of always being stuck" as a leader. :) Tick tick tick ... - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
