Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 07:06 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
As per this consensus, we'll proceed until the previously decided
nomination closing time (23:59 UTC today) to see if enough candidates
appear to stand for FDSCo election. If not, we'll postpone FDSCo
elections until the end of the month, freeing up the voting system for
others to use.
I'm a bit torn here, showing my indecisive side quite clearly:
* We have not enough candidates for an election (3 nominations, 3 seats,
so voting isn't useful)
I agree that voting is not required IF the rules accept the current
situation of no contested seat. But voting might be useful if a voter
can choose to vote for another person, or vote against the person running.
If voting is required by rules then do it asap. Before one of the
three have have cold feet :-)
Karl
* To fill up the nominations is feeling very rushed, with four hours
left to go
* People on this project are not fully aware of the election
* Serious people have put up their names for nomination, and they
deserve respect and a fair/useful election
* Putting off until 24 Dec. or later for elections really means we want
to wait until the New Year, which is _very_far_off_ our schedule of
"just after the release." Oops.
* FAMSCo seems ready to go and chomping at the bit
* If we postpone we risk losing the momentum we have
* Someone is potentially upset with the outcome no matter what the
decision
Oops, sorry, the last point is just my "place of always being stuck" as
a leader. :)
Tick tick tick ...
- Karsten
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
GPG DF28 8F18 94F8 D5C6 9E44 163F 7FD1 3D06 C325 DA40
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
