On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:56 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > Although that means revision histories will be written differently > > than they are now, that's not a problem. DocBook doesn't mandate > > an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable. > > Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose. Instead of > an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of > "blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order. > > I figured that nicety could wait. Yeah, I'm starting to realize the more reading I do that XSLT is pretty danged powerful. And yes, I am in fact late to the party, as usual. ;-D -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
