Re: [RFC] Packaging technology update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> than they are now, that's not a problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate
> an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.

Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose.  Instead of
an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
"blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.

I figured that nicety could wait.

Cheers

Attachment: pgp6WGF5i5jNX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux