Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > On the other hand, a RPM %changelog often has more than one > explanatory line for details. I will try my hand at this one if > you agree, since I don't want to try your patience, and since I > want to see if I understand the concept well enough to DIY. (DIM?) Go ahead and welcome. I just didn't have time to investigate line wrapping the %changelog entries, but I'd be happy for your to take a swing. > I suppose, thanks to your display of XML skillz, we can even validate > this info during the build process to make sure nothing breaks! Sweet. BTW, order matters in the %changelog entries. I always take the version and release numbers from the very first <revision> element. That's why there is that mandatory, only-one-alternative "ordered=" attribute; it's really documentation. Cheers
Attachment:
pgpzH5qyqYDUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
