Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > Maybe valid XML would be easier. :-D Should read: > <changelog> > <docrevision> > <date>2005-11-20</date> > <authorinitials>PWF</authorinitials> > <details>Some guff here</details> > </docrevision> > <pkgrevision> > <date>Sat Nov 26 2005</date> > <packager> > <name>Paul W. Frields</name> > <email>stickster at gmail</email> > <details>Fixed OMF</details> > <details>Did something else important</details> > </packager> > </pkgrevision> > </changelog> I don't really like this <docrevision> / <pkgrevision> stuff. The "role=doc" or "role=rpm" more succinctly captures the reason for a particular change having been made. I hope this is not a NIH issue, but having frobbed around with the XSLT stylesheets a bit, I think I like my approach better. How about we keep the CVS versions of the DTD and XSLT stylesheets in sync? Cheers
Attachment:
pgpkPsv6YgAdI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
