Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users- >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson >> Sent: 10 November 2010 14:26 >> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. >> Subject: Re: [389-users] upgrading packages >> >> Angel Bosch Mora wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> >> In general, it can't. The reason is that you may be using a centralized >> configuration directory server to manage several hosts with one 389- >> console. If you do that, the data that needs to be updated is on the remote >> server which hosts the configuration directory server (the one with the >> o=NetscapeRoot suffix). We need to get at least the console admin >> password to update that information remotely. >> >>> - does it matter how many instances are configured? >>> > > Is "admin server" and "centralized configuration directory" the same thing here? > No. The configuration directory server is the directory server that has the o=NetscapeRoot suffix. The admin server is the http(s) agent running on each machine that handles console authentication and access, and runs CGI programs. > I am slightly confused about this. I thought that you had to have a admin server for each physical hosts? > Yes. > Regards > > [Gerrard Geldenhuis] > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from > MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
