Re: [389-users] upgrading packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
> Sent: 10 November 2010 14:26
> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [389-users] upgrading packages
> 
> Angel Bosch Mora wrote:
> > hi,
> In general, it can't.  The reason is that you may be using a centralized
> configuration directory server to manage several hosts with one 389-
> console.  If you do that, the data that needs to be updated is on the remote
> server which hosts the configuration directory server (the one with the
> o=NetscapeRoot suffix).  We need to get at least the console admin
> password to update that information remotely.
> > - does it matter how many instances are configured?

Is "admin server" and "centralized configuration directory" the same thing here?

I am slightly confused about this. I thought that you had to have a admin server for each physical hosts?

Regards

 [Gerrard Geldenhuis] 


________________________________________________________________________
In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from 
MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses.

________________________________________________________________________
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux