>> > It would probably be better if libglade2 owned %{libdir}/libglade and
>> > %{libdir}/libglade/2.0. Can you take care of that ?
>> I made the changes in Rawhide. Can we have the fix in Fedora 9 & 10 as
>> updates? Fedora 8 would be a bit too much, I guess?
> If you do the builds, I won't object...
Tagged and built for F-8, F-9 and F-10 now. I put in a versioned
Requires on libglade2 in libgnomecanvas to avoid %{_libdir}/libglade
from becoming unowned if someone only updated libgnomecanvas. However
I did not bump the BuildRequires on libglade2-devel since the new
libglade2 packages are not yet in the buildroots and the directory
issue won't make any difference.
Thanks,
Debarshi
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
