On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd rather see something replace it.
SELinux obsoletes this use of chroot for security. Every daemon
doesn't need to grow its own private copy of the OS infrastructure.
You're absolutely right. And in fact, it makes a lot of things for
me a lot easier. I'll look into getting unbound proper SElinux
policies, though if anyone has pointers for me, those would be
appreciated.
Paul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
