On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 00:31 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > It would probably be better if libglade2 owned %{libdir}/libglade and
> > %{libdir}/libglade/2.0. Can you take care of that ?
>
> I made the changes in Rawhide. Can we have the fix in Fedora 9 & 10 as
> updates? Fedora 8 would be a bit too much, I guess?
>
If you do the builds, I won't object...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
