On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 17:43 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> >> I need to put a symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ [1] and found that
> >> it is libgnomecanvas that owns it and not libglade in Fedora 9.
> >>
> >> [rishi@freebook ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libglade/
> >> libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
> >> [rishi@freebook ~]$
> >>
> >> Is this how it is supposed to be? Or is this a bug?
>
> > Neither libglade nor libglade-devel include the %{_libdir}/libglade
> > directory or anything within it.
>
> Maybe I was not very clear. I used "libglade" to mean the any of the
> libglade packages -- 1.0 and 2.0.
>
> My main objective is to know whether a package that is going to put a
> symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ would need to have 'Requires:
> libgnomecanvas' because, if not anything, it looks a bit odd to me
> since it looks related to libglade.
It would probably be better if libglade2 owned %{libdir}/libglade and
%{libdir}/libglade/2.0. Can you take care of that ?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
