On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:15:07 +0900
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote, at 11/07/2008 10:11 PM +9:00:
> >>> My main objective is to know whether a package that is going to
> >>> put a symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ would need to have
> >>> 'Requires: libgnomecanvas' because, if not anything, it looks a
> >>> bit odd to me since it looks related to libglade.
> >> libgnomecanvas has the dependency on libglade-2.0.so.0,
> >> libgnomecanvas.src has "BuildRequires: libglade2-devel", so
> >> I guess %_libdir/libglade{,/2.0} must be owned by libglade2. not
> >> by libgnomecanvas.
> >
> > You might expect so, but it's not the case:
> >
> > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libglade/{,2.0/}
> > libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
> > libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
>
>
> So what I am saying is that this is a bug in both libglade2
> and libgnomecanvas.
>
> c.f some similar example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491
Yes, I agree.
Paul.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
