Debarshi Ray wrote, at 11/07/2008 09:13 PM +9:00:
I need to put a symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ [1] and found that
it is libgnomecanvas that owns it and not libglade in Fedora 9.
[rishi@freebook ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libglade/
libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.x86_64
[rishi@freebook ~]$
Is this how it is supposed to be? Or is this a bug?
Neither libglade nor libglade-devel include the %{_libdir}/libglade
directory or anything within it.
Maybe I was not very clear. I used "libglade" to mean the any of the
libglade packages -- 1.0 and 2.0.
My main objective is to know whether a package that is going to put a
symlink in %{_libdir}/libglade/2.0/ would need to have 'Requires:
libgnomecanvas' because, if not anything, it looks a bit odd to me
since it looks related to libglade.
libgnomecanvas has the dependency on libglade-2.0.so.0,
libgnomecanvas.src has "BuildRequires: libglade2-devel", so
I guess %_libdir/libglade{,/2.0} must be owned by libglade2. not
by libgnomecanvas.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
