Re: Reasons to preseve X on tty7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 13:42 +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [20081029 12:38]:
Well, the community is saying that reason is not good enough.
I think it's fair to ask the package maintainer to reconsider.
Making changes that break years-long traditional behaviour
without community consultation is arrogant at best.
Breaking with tradition created things like OS-X (which fwiw is what
any sane desktop out there today is trying to emulate).

Doing something because "it's always been done like that" is a really
bad reason. Doing something on technical merit and changing when a
better way to do something is found is what I think should be done.

Which tty you run X on I don't really care, as I think the end goal
should be to ditch X and do what OS-X did.

The biggest innovations happened by not following the sheep.

Actually, the biggest innovations aren't innovations. More times than
not they are evolutionary steps taken by slowly modifying an existing
design. They only look like innovations when viewed from the future.

A great example: A very bright individual once said to me "we need a
revolutionary change like the CD was from the cassette tape for music".
To which I responded:
   1. the cd was preceded by the less successful laser disc
   2. they were both preceded by wildly successful vinyl record.

The concept of spinning media storing data and allowing you to seek to
any location on the media nearly instantly is not a new idea.

There's no one working in computing today ANYWHERE who is doing
revolutionary work. I'd argue there is no such thing as revolutionary
work AT ALL. Stop looking for it where it is not.

I don't quite understand the obsession with making boot time faster anyway. Machines should only boot when they have a new kernel to install. If they aren't needed all the time they should sleep or hibernate, waking up with everything still running.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux