Re: Reasons to preseve X on tty7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 29 October 2008 at 10:31, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:25 +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
> > You are responding to an issue that no one is bringing up. No one is 
> > talking about how many mingettys are launched. On the other hand you
> > are declaring as a resolved starting point the very thing that is
> > being questioned. The question is "who gets tty1".
> 
> Who cares? If X lives on tty7 and you get an extra flicker, then that's
> bad. If it lives on ttyX and it doesn't flicker, it's good.
> 
> The sort of person that even knows what a tty is, is probably in a
> position where they can change it to whatever they want. Seriously, had
> anyone done any research on the number of Fedora users who even use
> ttys?
> 
> This isn't a community decision decided by +1 or -1's. This is the
> package maintainer (and upstream) changing with a good reason.

Well, the community is saying that reason is not good enough.
I think it's fair to ask the package maintainer to reconsider.
Making changes that break years-long traditional behaviour
without community consultation is arrogant at best.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux