On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 23:36 -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > I would argue strongly that this change should not be made for the > following reasons (in no particular order): Does it matter? Seriously, we need to start X on ttyX and start ONE mingetty on ttyX+1. Loading mingetty on 6 terminals takes time. Who uses more than one mingetty anyway? Surely the sort of person comfortable with the RSI-inducing ctrl-alt-Fx is the sort of person that can edit a config file and increase the number if we provide one by default. I was thinking about trying to tackle the boot time of fedora (and get to the 5 second nirvana), but I fear that bikeshedding like this will mean we are still loading sendmail, isdn, nfslock, and all other legacy stuff in ten years time. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
